Monday: Why follower count is dying
Tuesday: What platforms are doing
Today: How influencer marketplaces are adapting (and why it's faster than you think)

The money is moving, let’s follow it.

Influencer Marketplaces Are Repricing Everything:

AspireIQ's Creator Marketplace has over 1 million influencers.

Their minimum requirements for campaigns:

  • Instagram: 200 engagements per post (not follower count)

  • TikTok: 2,000 views per video

  • YouTube: 500 views per video

Default minimum follower count: 1,000. But engagement thresholds matter more.

Translation: You can have 100K followers. If your engagement is below 200/post, you're invisible on the platform.

The shift is already here.

Marketplaces aren't pricing by reach anymore. They're pricing by engagement.

Brands use filters like:

  • Engagement rate (not follower count)

  • Audience demographics

  • Content style

  • Past collaboration performance

Influencer Hero pricing starts at $649/month. Their competitive advantage: AI-powered fraud detection that identifies fake followers and inflated engagement.

HypeAuditor built an entire business on influencer verification—filtering out fake engagement before brands waste money.

The pattern:

Every major marketplace is adding:

  • Engagement rate minimums

  • Fraud detection tools

  • Quality score algorithms

  • Authentic engagement verification

Follower count still exists. It's just not the price determinant anymore.

The 59-sec takeaway:

Influencer marketplaces are market signals.
When they repriced from "reach" to "engagement," they revealed:

  • What brands actually value (conversions over impressions)

  • What creators should optimize for (engagement over followers)

  • Where the money is moving (nano/micro over mega)

Aspire's marketplace allows brands to set eligibility requirements: follower count, engagement rate, location.

But the engagement rate filter is what matters most.

Remove it, and you get flooded with low-quality applications.
Keep it, and you get creators who actually drive sales.

How I'd use this:

If you're a creator/influencer:

Stop buying followers and start optimizing for engagement.

Marketplaces are filtering you by:

  • Reply rate (do people comment?)

  • Save rate (do people bookmark?)

  • Share rate (do people send to friends?)

  • Click rate (do people take action?)

AspireIQ's search tool prioritizes: audience demographics, engagement rate, and hashtags.

Follower count is a filter. Engagement rate is the ranking signal.

For Under 59: I don't pitch "13 subscribers."

I pitch:

  • 82% open rate (3x industry average)

  • 25% reply rate (12x industry average)

Quality metrics > vanity metrics.
Better Engagement means better monetization.

Why this matters for Monday's prediction:

Marketplaces are already doing it.

Option B (marketplaces pivot to engagement-only pricing) is partially true already.

The question: Do they make it official and remove follower count entirely from pricing?

Or keep follower count as a minor filter while engagement drives all pricing?

Clue #3 collected.

Tomorrow: What mega-influencers are doing to survive (spoiler: buying fake engagement).

Talk soon,
Pavan

P.S. AspireIQ's minimum: 200 engagements per post, not 10K followers. The market already voted. Engagement won.

Reply

or to participate